We’re a funny lot.
Humans.
So often, we can’t see the woods for our own opinions.
We’re so busy trying to prove our way is the right way, we often forget there’s more than one right answer.
Because we make assumptions.
Assumptions that, once made, frame every decision we make – and therefore stop us looking beyond the edges of that framework. Outside the square.
Take the classic nine dots problem.
. . .
. . .
. . .
The original challenge is to connect all nine dots – with four straight lines – without taking your pen off the paper.
It’s the classic “Think Outside The Square”.
I often use this problem in workshops – because it helps people see the assumptions they make.
There is always someone who shouts, “I know this one.”
And then either answers the question (drawing one diagonal, then a horizontal pushing past the imagined boundaries of the box formed by the dots, then another diagonal – picking up two more dots – again past the imagined frame of the “box”, and finishing with a vertical) or providing an answer that doesn’t fit the question.
For instance, often, I’ll find someone who draws four straight lines – three verticals and a horizontal – joining the dots,but taking their pen off the paper in the process. Because they heard the first part of the challenge – and didn’t listen to the next bit, or because they assumed there’s a trick, or because they answered the question – even if it meant not following the instruction.
Because they found certainty. And didn’t need to look any more.
As someone once noted. Confidence is that cocky feeling you get just before you realise you’re wrong.
Anyway.
Then the workshop gets interesting.
Because I ask people to join the dots with one straight line.
And, to short circuit any cries of “Impossible” – I mention there are at least six answers.
The issue, for most people, is that they are still constrained by the first challenge. “Not taking your pen off the paper”.
But the objective changes. And so does the instruction.
It’s something I think we can all be guilty of – assuming the rules for one situation apply to all situations. So we stay neatly in our box. We don’t question anything.
It’s one reason I do like my 5 year old’s continual quest for where the boundary is.
If we get angry for him drawing on the walls with pen, he promises not to do it again.
Then we see him drawing on the wall with crayon.
And get angry.
And he gets confused. “But you said not to draw on the wall with PEN!”
See. In his world, he’s seeing the possibilities. Not the boundaries. But playing to the boundaries.
Most of us assume the boundaries, even if they’re not there.
The result, perhaps, of a lifetime of training.
And something we should all be aware of.
Don’t let your assumptions stop you from seeing the possibilities.
…
And the answers – for those 6 ways of joining nine dots.
Cut the paper into nine squares – and put the squares in a line – and draw a straight line through them.
(No one said you couldn’t cut the paper.)
Cut the paper into nine squares – and pile them on top of each other – and join the with a pin.
(No one said the line had to be drawn.)
Roll the paper into a tube and draw a continuous line around and around the paper until you join all the dots.
(No one said the paper had to stay flat.)
Draw a line through the top three dots and continue around the room until you come back to the paper and collect the middle three dots and around the room again to collect the last dots.
(No one said the pen couldn’t leave the paper.)
Fold the paper – like in the old MAD Magazine – so the outside edge of the outside dots meets the inside of the the inside dots – and you form three dots – then draw a line through them.
(No one said you couldn’t fold the paper.)
And – as one clever person said – write the word “Onestraightline” in cursive – not taking your pen off the paper – and make sure you cover every dot with the writing.
(You are still joining the dots with one straight line.)